247K+ AI events recorded on our own fleet · last 30 days AI events on our own fleet · 30d
Security & governancePut your AI policies into practice.EngineeringGive developers AI tools with clear rules.LeadershipAdoption, ROI and risk in one view.
Works with Cursor · Claude Code · ChatGPT · GitHub CopilotExplore the platform →
Our approachObserve first, then set rules.Why we built itA note from our founder.InsightureThe team behind Tracelet.
DESIGN PARTNERSShape Tracelet with us.Three months, hands-on, in your cloud. →
SecurityHow Tracelet keeps data in your cloud.Shadow AIHow exposed is your organisation?Real-world incidentsWhen AI actions go wrong.BlogPerspectives on governing AI.FAQAnswers to common questions.

Leadership

Understand your engineering AI rollout.

One view of adoption, policy findings and coverage, plus what the spend bought and which vendor it rests on.

Become a design partner See the questions

Answers for the next rollout review.

Measured on enrolled machines, not surveyed. Each team agrees its own benchmark. Values shown are illustrative.

  1. Which teams are using AI coding tools?

    Share of enrolled machines with recorded AI activity, by team.

  2. What did policy find?

    Findings from the last 28 days, broken down by severity.

  3. How much of the fleet is covered?

    Machines enrolled and reporting, against the target you set.

Vendor strategy

Who does the rollout depend on?

See how much AI spend sits with one vendor, what a price change would cost and where alternatives exist. Go into the next vendor conversation with numbers.

  • Lower vendor riskKnow when you depend too much on one provider.
  • Cut spend safelyFind routine work that can move to a cheaper tier.
TraceletLeadership / Spend & ROI

Spend & ROI

Where the AI budget goes: spend, return, forecast and vendor exposure.

Diversification

38concentrated

The primary vendor carries most of the platform spend.

  • Primary vendor71
  • Second vendor16
  • Self-hosted8
  • Two vendors5
Platform spend
$41.0K
Providers
4
Top vendor share
71%

Spend by provider

ProviderShare%Spend
Frontier modelsPrimary vendor
71%$29.1K
Frontier modelsSecond vendor
16%$6.6K
Open-weight modelsSelf-hosted
8%$3.3K
Embeddings and small modelsTwo vendors
5%$2.0K

Leverage

  • Blended rateWeighted across every provider and tier in use$6.40/M
  • Tiering opportunityIf routine workloads moved to the standard tier$7.2K
  • Portable spend$23.8K has an active same-tier alternative today58%

Price-shock scenario

Top vendorPrimary$29.1K · 71% of spend
Spend under scenario$48.3K+$7.3K vs today
Exposure71%of spend tied to one vendor

Scenario applies the price increase to the top vendor's slice only; the rest of the mix is held constant. Illustrative, not a forecast.

ConcentrationExposureLeverageOne vendor view

Spend forecast

Where are spend and return heading?

Project spend, hours saved and net return from today's run-rate. Test headcount and pricing before the budget round.

  • No budget surprisesKnow where spend lands before the month ends.
  • Usage vs budgetSee whether adoption grows with the spend.
TraceletLeadership / Spend & ROI

Spend & ROI

Where the AI budget goes: spend, return, forecast and vendor exposure.

Projected monthly spend

$44.2K

$1.47K a day run-rate

Spend to date

$26.5K

12 days left in the cycle

Projected net ROI

$198K

1,540 hours saved, projected

Active developers

186 / 300

62% adoption

Spend forecast

solid = actual · dashed = projected run-rate
$0$10K$20K$30K$40K$50KDay 1Day 5Day 10Day 15Day 20Day 25Day 30Today · day 18$44.2K projected
$0$25K$50KDay 1Day 10Day 20Day 30
Actual, days 1–18 Projected, days 19–30 Today

Scenario planner

Move a lever and both figures move with it
Headcount
Unit price
Scenario monthly spend
$44.2K
= baseline
Scenario net ROI
$198K
= baseline

Assumes linear run-rate, current keep rate held constant, and value scaling proportionally with headcount. A planning scenario, not a commitment.

Run-rateScenariosReturnOne planning view

Fleet risk

What is the fleet exposed to?

Findings, secrets and destinations rolled into one fleet risk score, with the enforcement mode beside it.

  • Know if risk is improvingTrack exposure over time, by severity.
  • Elevated access in viewSee emergency access across the fleet.
  • Numbers you can defendReal counts, never guessed dollar figures.
TraceletLeadership / Risk & assurance

Risk & compliance

Findings, violations, compliance coverage, break-glass activity and assurance.

76% of licensed seats are under an active governed agent this week

Fleet security score

42/ 100

At risk: critical findings are still open, and three teams only record.

  • Critical11
  • High23
  • Medium29
  • Low28
Open critical
4of 34 critical + high
Secrets detected
6in 30d
Unapproved destinations
9of 138 domains
Enforcement
mixed3 of 8 teams record only

Weighted risk trend

30d
04080Sep 3Sep 10Sep 17Sep 24Oct 3

Finding status

  • Open31
  • Triaged12
  • Resolved60
  • Suppressed4

Break-glass activity

Requests18
Granted72%
Pending2

Time-boxed elevated access. The same keycards engineering approves on the governance side, rolled up for the board. Median window 30 minutes.

Prevented loss

Secrets caught6
Egress blocked12
Dangerous actions blocked5
Break-glass denied3

Counts only, deliberately no dollar figure. A fabricated "avoided breach cost" would undermine every honest number next to it.

ExposureFindingsBreak-glassOne risk view

Give AI room to work. Keep your business in control.

Tell us about your team, the tools you use, and the work you want to protect.

Let’s talk